← All posts

Five signs a prediction market may be mispriced

Mispricings rarely announce themselves. These are the recurring patterns worth checking before you decide a market has the odds wrong.

1. The news moved and the price didn't

Prediction markets reprice fast on headline events and slowly on quiet ones — a regulatory filing, a court docket update, a change in a scheduled data release. When you can point to a specific piece of public information that postdates the last meaningful price move, you have a reason to think the price is stale.

Stale is not the same as wrong. Sometimes the market has already read the filing and concluded it doesn't matter. Read it yourself before deciding which.

2. Related markets disagree

If one market says a candidate has a 30% chance of winning a nomination and another says 45% for winning the general election, something is broken — the second outcome requires the first. Logically nested markets that don't respect their nesting are among the cleanest mispricing signals available.

The same applies across platforms. The same question priced 6¢ apart on two venues is worth a look, once you've confirmed the resolution criteria genuinely match.

3. The volume is concentrated in a few wallets

A market whose recent volume comes from two or three large accounts is showing you those accounts' views, not a crowd's. That cuts both ways: sophisticated traders taking a big position is informative, and one determined participant pushing a price is not.

Order book depth tells you which. A price supported by thin depth on both sides moves on small flow and will keep doing so.

4. The contract is cheap

Sub-10¢ contracts are systematically overpriced across most prediction market venues, for the same reason lottery tickets are. A 4¢ contract implies a 4% chance; ask yourself honestly whether the event happens one time in twenty-five.

The mirror of this is that expensive contracts — the 92¢ near-certainties — are often slightly underpriced, though the capital efficiency of holding one to resolution is usually poor.

5. The resolution language is doing hidden work

Plenty of apparent mispricings are just careful readers pricing in a technicality: a deadline measured in a specific time zone, a source of truth that reports on a lag, an outcome that requires official confirmation rather than reporting.

Always read the resolution criteria before concluding the market is wrong. More often than not, when a price looks obviously mistaken, the market has read something you haven't.

A closing caution

None of these are signals to trade on by themselves. They're prompts to look harder at a specific market, and the looking is where the work is. A checklist that tells you where to spend attention is worth a lot; a checklist you mistake for a strategy is worth less than nothing.

Keep reading

Polymarket and Iran: how the markets are pricing the conflict

A dated snapshot of Polymarket's Iran markets — ceasefire, nuclear, leadership, and Strait of Hormuz odds as of late July 2026 — and how to read them without getting burned.

Read post →

What is Kalshi?

A plain-English guide to Kalshi: what it is, how its CFTC-regulated event contracts and dollar settlement work, what you can trade, and what to understand before you do.

Read post →